This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Read More
When comparing the FLAC versions of Grace Jones' , the 2015 Remaster is generally considered the superior choice for modern listeners because it restores the album to its original full-length vinyl structure. Most earlier digital versions were abridged, missing crucial interviews and transitions that define the album's "audio-biography" concept. Version Comparison & Audio Integrity 1985 Original CD (Island) 2015 Remaster (Culture Factory) Track List Often Abridged (edited versions) Full-length (matches 1985 LP) Interviews Frequently omitted Fully restored Loudness Lower volume, higher headroom Louder with boosted clarity Dynamic Range High, preserved original peaks Mixed reviews; punchier but some report compression Key Considerations for Your Choice
For decades, fans and audiophiles have debated which version is superior. Fast forward to the 2015 ZTT Records remasters—available in high-resolution FLAC—and the conversation changed. This article dives into why the 2015 FLAC remaster of Slave to the Rhythm is widely considered better, offering a superior listening experience over the original 1985 issues. The 1985 Original: A Product of its Time
Conceived by the legendary producer , the album is structured as an "audio biography". It’s a conceptual masterpiece where each of its eight tracks is a radical variation of the same title song, dissecting different facets of Jones's persona and life story.
: Some listeners feel the original master captures a specific "melancholy" and atmospheric vibe that is slightly altered by the increased loudness of the 2015 version. Comparisons at a Glance 1985 Original CD / Early Master 2015 HD Remaster (FLAC) Tracklist Often edited/abridged Complete vinyl version Volume Low / "Lifeless" Significantly louder Dynamic Range High (DR 14-15) Lower (DR 6-8) Detail Warm but sometimes "thin" Modern clarity and "punch" Audiophile Fit Better for high DR purists Better for completeness/modern gear Final Recommendation
The 2015 reissues and remasters relevant to Grace Jones’s catalogue—depending on which specific release is referenced—often aimed to present cleaner, more dynamically consistent masters than some earlier pressings. When a 2015 FLAC release is touted as "better," that improvement can stem from several concrete factors:
is superior because it fixes the "sloppy" track indexing and missing content of earlier reissues, despite the slight loss in dynamic range. track-by-track breakdown
In 1985, digital compact discs were a premium format. Sound engineers mixed albums with massive headroom to exploit the 96dB dynamic range of 16-bit audio. 1. Uncompressed Dynamic Range
The "better" version ultimately depends on your hardware and your ears. If you are listening on a vintage setup with a warm preamp, the 1985 version maintains that nostalgic, airy punch. But if you are using high-end modern DACs and open-back headphones, the 2015 remaster reveals a level of clinical detail that makes Grace Jones feel like she is standing in the room with you. The 2015 version also includes a wealth of "Work in Progress" versions and single edits that provide a fascinating look at the song’s evolution.
While "better" can be subjective based on your gear, the consensus among collectors on platforms like Super Deluxe Edition and Discogs leans toward the 2015 release for two primary reasons: and Clarity .
